Many of the performance shortfalls in waste management trace back to structural problems, not effort or intention. Systems largely designed in the 1980s and ’90s are simply not capable of achieving the material recovery and methane-reduction rates that climate imperatives now demand. Closing the gap will require leapfrogging the current model, not patching it.
In the news
This Week in Waste
The Recycling Participation Gap: Why 87% Support Can’t Even Produce 30% Results
The disconnect between Americans’ stated support for recycling and actual recycling rates is one of the most persistent structural problems in the field. While 87% of Americans say recycling is important, confusion over inconsistent program design, inconvenient frequency of collection, material acceptance limits, and other barriers have pushed national recycling rates below 30%. Only 43% of households actually participate, and even those who do place only about 57% of their recyclables in the bin.
Key takeaway: Closing the gap will require simultaneous investment in better access and infrastructure, education, and trust: if people don’t believe their recyclables are actually being recycled, they stop trying.
Sources: Keep America Beautiful / Harris Poll (2025) ·
The Recycling Partnership
Landfill Methane: An Important Climate Solution Hidden in Plain Sight
Solid waste disposal is one of the most underappreciated contributors to climate change. In 2022, greenhouse gas emissions from solid waste management were estimated at approximately 1.28 billion metric tons of CO₂ equivalent, with methane accounting for 90% of the total. A 2025 Nature Climate Change analysis found that methane emissions from open dumps are underestimated by more than a factor of five in standard global inventories — and that diverting organics while converting open dumpsites to managed landfills could cut methane emissions by up to 80%. Global waste generation is projected to grow 50% by 2050.
Key takeaway: Reducing what goes to landfill — especially food waste and organics — is one of the highest-leverage climate interventions available to local waste programs.
Sources: Clean Air Task Force (April 2026) ·
Nature Climate Change (2025)
From SWEEP: Reducing Your Food Waste Is (Officially) the Best Thing You Can Do to Fight Climate Change — SWEEP’s blog draws on Project Drawdown data to make the case that food waste reduction is the single most impactful climate action available to individuals and communities.
The Standards Gap: How Do You Know If a Waste Program Is Actually Performing?
Until recently, unlike evaluation systems for energy and buildings (LEED, ENERGY STAR) which have been in existence for decades, there is no nationally recognized, comprehensive framework for rating the overall sustainability of a waste program. SWEEP was developed specifically to fill this gap: a market transformation standard targeting municipalities and waste service providers to identify and reward leaders in sustainable materials management.
Key takeaway: Without performance standards, “sustainable waste management” remains a self-claim rather than a verified achievement.
Sources: SWEEP Standard ·
SWEEP Certification
EPR as a Systemic Fix: Why Extended Producer Responsibility Could Bolster Recycling Economics
Extended producer responsibility has moved from policy concept to practical reality in seven U.S. states, but the underlying rationale deserves more attention as a structural solution to recycling’s chronic funding problems. The Recycling Partnership’s analysis estimates EPR policies could raise recycling rates above 60% by driving investment in collection, infrastructure, and communication. EPR programs have the potential to make recycling more convenient, increase participation rates, improve material quality, and drive investment in new sorting infrastructure.
Key takeaway: EPR is a financing model that can finally align producer incentives with the real costs of end-of-life material management.
Sources: The Recycling Partnership ·
Waste Dive – US Recycling Policy Tracker
From SWEEP: Taking Circularity National: Truth in Labeling, a Bottle Bill and More — SWEEP’s recap of its webinar with Heidi Sanborn of the National Stewardship Action Council covers EPR, bottle bills, and the policy levers most likely to shift recycling system economics.
Focus on SWEEP
Download the SWEEP+ Standard
The SWEEP+ Standard is the only comprehensive, measurable framework for evaluating the sustainability of a solid waste program — covering everything from collection and diversion to equity, climate impact, and end markets. See how your program measures up.
| ⬇ Download the SWEEP Standard |